The funder (in the case of cash flow) and the initiator (in the case of storage financing) can use the transactions as a springboard to refinancing credits on the public market and as an opportunity to potentially access more favourable financing. Switching to securitization or other ABS operations will likely be easier due to the architecture and documentation of a stock, but remains an achievable exit option for funders of a forward flow. Mintos Finance is a company of the Mintos Group. You will find a detailed description of the structure in the Mintos financial loan agreement and in the transfer agreement. This agreement confirms our partnership with one of Europe`s largest consumer banks and we are proud that they have trusted Hoist Finance as their preferred partner in helping them deal with unsecured consumer credit bad debts over the next 18 months. “,” says Hoist Finance CEO, Jurgen Olsson. Cash flow agreements, which transfer the advantageous interest and economic interest of a loan against cash to a lender, have become an increasingly popular financing option for specialty developers. In this brief remark, we look at the rise of this relatively new entrant into the funding landscape and look at some differences from the conditions we are seeing. One of the most important decisions for any new entrant to the mortgage market is the financing of the crucial early phase of its creation.

In the absence of the assistance of entrenched investors, able to provide equity to obtain and serve a large volume of mortgages, new initiators have traditionally opted for inventory financing as their preferred financing method. However, a notable recent trend has been the emergence of cash flow agreements as a viable alternative. This note examines some of the characteristics of forward financing structures and inventory financing structures from the perspective of a new initiator and examines why the forward flow is gaining traction. The forward flow works in a slightly different way. If an underlying loan is more than 60 days late, the credit company is required to replace it with a new one, and the investment remains in the cash flow, in accordance with the cash flow agreement. If the credit company is unable to do so, it must repay the entire cash flow.